Archived discussions

Jump to: navigation, search

The following discussions took place before liquid threads was installed.


Peter: It just occurred to me, it's not clear what (if any) license this wiki is using. I think it would be a good idea to choose one ASAP, while the editors are all still available to agree (and sign, if we want to make it legally binding). I personally recommend a license that is compatible with CC-By-SA -- such as CC-By-SA itself, or CC-By, or CC-Zero, which is the one I use whenever possible, since it maximizes potential for re-use. (See for example the waiver we used in the Peeragogy project). Arided 19:27, 9 October 2012 (BST)

PeterT 06:47, 10 October 2012 (BST)
We are using CC-By-SA. This is stated in the blurb at the bottom of every edit page, just above the save button. Perhaps it needs to be somewhere else too?
Yeah, it would be good to put it on the bottom of every rendered page, for example with an image down by the "Powered by MediaWiki" button. There's a button-chooser here: by-sa-unported-3.0 button chooser, from which I grabbed the relevant part: <a rel="license" href=""><img alt="Creative Commons License" style="border-width:0" src="" /> </a> Arided 22:16, 10 October 2012 (BST)
I'll have to add this to my techy wish list as I don't know how to do it. PeterT 06:45, 11 October 2012 (BST)
BTW I actually don't see anything about CC-By-SA when I go to press save. I see this: "Please note that all contributions to EdFutures may be edited, altered, or removed by other contributors. If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly, then do not submit it here. You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource (see EdFutures:Copyrights for details). Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!" I could fix these things for you but I'd need access to the installation. Arided 22:44, 11 October 2012 (BST)
Hmm. It is the EdFutures:Copyrights that contains the details. I take the point that this info needs to be more prominent. Aiming to sort tetchy admin support in next few days. Ideally I want someone, or a couple of people who can do all the things on the tetchy to do list. Might you be that person? PeterT 07:02, 12 October 2012 (BST)


Question for you at Talk:The Profession. Arided 09:03, 4 October 2012 (BST)


About the ICT Curriculum page: the title was originally 24-Sept-2015 NFER survey that's why I changed it! Arided 12:09, 28 September 2012 (BST)

PeterT 17:53, 28 September 2012 (BST)
No worries - good to see you being proactive. You were right in thinking that title was misleading so thank you for provoking me to make it more sensible.
PeterT03:52, 30 November 2012